Friday, November 25, 2005

Hey, everybody's doing it

If I get sick and die, it'd suck and I imagine that I would resist, but more as a matter of habit and fear than any real metaphysical understanding of what is happening. But it wouldn't be all bad. I'd shuffle off this mortal coil and get to leave behind the dissatisfaction, the stress, the mind spinning like a record, baby round right round now, the fatigue, the projections, the lack of understanding, the rigidity, the pain, the mania, the curses, the horror.

I still can't shake the feeling of how intense it must be to realize that you're dying, the guilt you must feel for leaving, for causing pain, sadness, heartache. The anger at all of the moments missed out on. How horrible it must be to leave loved ones behind, to see on their faces the realization that life's subtle shifts can be quite seismic, the ripple of shockwaves unending.

In living and dying, I sometimes find myself thinking about my maternal grandfather, who grew up in a well-off orthodox Jewish home in Poland before the second war changed the continent.
I wonder about the time he spent dreaming of the many lives he might lead growing up. What did he imagine he would become. Family business? Make his own fortune? Marry a rich Polish countess?
At any point in the twilight of his life, maybe when staring out the window on the bus ride home from work and feeling tired and pensive, did he wonder how the hell life brought him there?
When he was lying on his deathbed in some two-story cutout on Lawton St in the Sunset District in San Francisco, CA in 1978, if for a moment as his life played out before his eyes, did he wonder: How in the hell did I end up here? How did my life take me down this road? Not in a million years when I was a boy cutting class, smoking cigarettes in the janitor's closet. Or when I was in a TB quarant. did I imagine this...
Is that something we all will know?

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Top 10 ways to tell if your boyfriend is gay

10. He knows exactly where he was and what he was wearing the night Barbra retook the stage in Vegas
9. He knows how to lisp in 7 different languages
8. His idea of a "perfect evening" includes pitchers of cosmos and the anniversary DVD of Will and Grace
7. His cock tastes like shit
6. He insists on going as Bette Midler/Cher/Judy Garland every year for Holloween and "if you don't like it, you
can kiss my smug little stink hole, bitch."
5. When he says "please," it require two syllables, a head swivel, and a finger snap
4. He wanted to name his dog Liza or Madonna but settled on Boy George Michael
3. He knows whether Rogers or Hammerstein wrote the music
2. He finds himself achieving at sports just so his teammates will slap his ass
1. He's attracted to men

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Stoned Temple Pilots

My buddy Colin recently pointed out the illogical concept of a Stone Temple Pilot.
Stone temples tend to be large (in my experience) and otherwise immobile, so they hardly need caretakers much less pilots to helm the controls because they're fucking STONE TEMPLES.

Life is what happens while you're busy making other plans

maybe i was the big bopper in a past life.
I see in my mind's eye the plane as it
jostles and struggles to stay in the air
and the pilot slowly succumbs to the turbulent storm.
The terror.
The disbelief
hey, just a really rough flight. We'll be on the ground, warm and safe in our rooms.
It's not until the final few seconds that the realization hits...Maybe I'll survive the crash...

I was watching H play with his little girl, who is almost two, singing to her and throwing her hands around as she laughed and giggled. For the first time in my life, I really felt the hole that it must leave in a child's heart to lose a parent, and how hard it must be to die knowing that you're leaving this beautiful, vulnerable creature behind to fend for itself.
It made me think about my dad, who was three when his dad died. The lone memory he has is of his dad, L, singing "them bones" to him.
In seeing D, I get how even at three, S was a sentient person with feelings and intellect, despite the lack of memories.
The void must have been intense; imagine the beliefs that were created, the unimaginable grief and fear and helplessness he was ensconsed in. Life altering. Life shaping.
For the first time, I also got that leaving this earth must have been devistating for L,
him knowing that he wouldn't get to be part of his boy's world, his life, and barely his imagination and memory.

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Why is it "take a dump"

when clearly we leave something behind?
What would you do if you saw an endangered animal eating an endangered plant?
Do they have reserved parking for non-handicap people at the Special Olympics?
Isn't one being ostentatious when using the word "ostentatious"?
Why does your nose run and your feet smell?
How are fat chance and slim chance the same thing?
Does the thesaurus list another word for thesaurus? How about a synonym for synonym?
Why is it so hard to remember how to spell "mnemonic"?
Why isn't "phonetic" spelled the way it sounds?
What do sign makers picket with if they go on strike?
When someone yells "heads up," why does everyone always duck and cover?
Where does all the rubber from shoes or tires go?

Sunday, November 13, 2005

thirty-fucking-two

So I turned 32 today. OJ Simpson birthday. Magic Johnson. Carl Monroe (that jerrycurl muthafucka who used to play for the niners and caught the first touchdown in superbowl 19 against the dolphins and who was later found dead in a motel room of an overdose? Yep, the one and only)
What does 32 mean?
What does it mean? One thing I notice is that the more I use, the less capable I am of putting together my writings because my mind can't track. it seems when I am sober that the ideas just can't stop coming (and it feels so goddamn good. All I ever wanted to do was be prolific, to just write. It feels sooooooooo good to run my fingers across a keyboard as fast as I can thing and see what spills out the other end. I've spent too much time clogged up, but no more. I just don't feel that way. I can write like a muthafucka and it feels soooooo good to feel that about myself. It feels so good to tell people that I self-identify as a writer first and foremost, that the teaching of writing is just part of a larger consciousness that I am holding for myself).
These past few years have been, in many ways, exactly what my writing needed. I wonder what would have happened had I gone down an MFA or MA Creative writing path....I'm sure I would have gotten a lot out of it. But I feel like I got this wonderful cognitive piece that my brain absolutely thrived on. It was a piece of the picture that I may not have received in CW because the emphasis would have been different, however slight.
Also, the having to teach writing has given me insights into what writing is for me. It's no wonder that I feel so freed up about it. I've had so much time to really work through and overcome a lot of what stood in my way.

Friday, November 11, 2005

everything but the logic

Back in 1994, Everything but the Girl left its mark on the scene with an catchy electronica-inspired dancehall ballad of love and longing in which the vocalist claims to miss his/her lover "like the deserts miss the rain..."
Poetic, sensual, evocative...except for one thing: Deserts don't miss the rain. They're fucking deserts. By definition, the climate is arid and either intensely hot or cold. Even the wettest deserts get less than 10 inches of precipitation per year. So, a desert not only does not miss the rain (because the flora and fauna have adapted to the relatively harsh environs), it would be serverly damaged should it be exposed to excessive rainfall.
So, if we're to accurately conceptualize Everything's lyrics, the song is actually saying "I am completely equipped to handle life without you and miss you so little that I could actually be destroyed if I see too much of you."

chosen people

Interesting, provocative title for the jewish people, considering the suffering they've done over the last few thousand years (and how deeply ingrained that is in our collective psyche).
I'm trying to understand what that means to be chosen, but will admit it's rather far away from any kind of grounded theory, and so the following is just a tangible manifestation of my analysis of what it means to be chosen, for surely chosen also means to be chosen to suffer for the good of humanity or in order to help facilitate/advance/redefine the new global community.

Case I: The holocaust, the single defining moment of 20th century jewry

Don't forget, Germany did not lose WW II by that much. More so, it was hitler's megalomania that drove the nazi war machine to overextend itself, weakening itself to the point of defeat. Many critics point to germany's decision to invade Russia, thus violating a nonaggression act (which was probably understood to be temporary as fascism and communism have to square off eventually, even if both regimes were really just mascarading totalitarians) and opening up a second front. Rather than being able to allocate one's resources to one front, the germans found themselves middled--overextended in both directions.
What seldom, if ever, gets discussed is the fact that the nazis had already opened up a second front with their systematic genocide of jews and other undesirables. Think about the amount of resources, manpower, energy that was poured into the mass killings of jews. It's tantamount to fighting a third front.
In other words, the jews were chosen to suffer as part of resisting and ultimately defeating the nazis.
Also, remember that the race to atomic weaponry was in high gear; the number of jewish (and politically opposed) intellectuals and scientists, some of whom were instrumental in developing nuclear weapons, that hitler drove from the fatherland could have been the difference, especially if he could have found a way to exploit their genius and develop nuclear weapons first.

So, that's the suffering for the good of humanity part; as for advancing/redefining the new global community, the holocaust led directly to the miracle of Israel...but we'll save that for another time.

semantics and logic: An open letter to Bret Michaels

The venerable sage and former frontman for the legendary L.A. hairspray and makeup band Poison, Bret Michaels, claims that every rose has its thorn.

I'm certainly no expert on roses and have less than a layman's concept for the intricacy and nuance of horticulture in general. Furthermore, the few times that I have handled roses, in my memory, involved navigating prickly little thorns. So, it's no wonder that upon first hearing Michaels' rock ballad masterpiece circa 1989, I was moved to agree...yes indeed, every rose has it's thorn. But once I began to examine Mr. Michaels' logic, it fell shamefully apart; specifically his use of baseless analogy regarding cowboys calls into question the very premise of his song.

And I quote, "just like every cowboy sings a sad, sad song, every rose has it's thorn."
Well, let me be the first to break it to you, Bret: NOT every cowboy sings a sad, sad song. In fact, cowboys sing a lot of happy songs about being home on the range or rockabying sweet baby james or visiting towns in west texas (el paso, to be exact) where you can fall in love with mexican girls.

Thus, the fact that every cowboy clearly does not sing a sad, sad song, I think, undermines your assertion that every rose has a thorn. We cannot say with any degree of certainty that every rose does or does not have it's thorn, and so I feel it necessary to call into question the thesis of your song and am left to wonder where else you have led us astray.

Maybe the unskinny bop doesn't just blow you away
Do you really want us to give you something to believe in?
I sincerely doubt that you don't need nothing but a good time or that you won't forget me, baby
We're left to take you at your word, and I want to believe you, but right now your word isn't worth the paper it is printed on, Mr. Michaels.

Thursday, November 10, 2005

G.O.A.T. rantings

Quick digression: Fuck LL Cool J. Ladies don't love you, james, so much as they find themselves inextricably gravitating toward your persona of perceived dominant male status, marked by displays of hyperaggressive masculinity that almost-but-not-quite masks your vulnerability and angst from being a sensitive, black male in an uncaring world that tolerates neither blacks nor displays of emotions (which are derided as weak) from males. Such an odd concept, this idea that emotions = vulnerability = weakness. Energetically, this idea of closing off one's heart seems destructive (is it too great of a cognitive leap to link this to the fact that heart disease is the number one killer in this country?)

Anyway, I iust wanted to weigh in on the greatest football player of all time debate so my readers know where I stand.
Hands down, Jerry Rice is the greatest football player of all time. Any other arguments to the contrary are welcome, but I've yet to find them compelling enough to disuade me.
First, some backgroung information. I consider myself a die hard 49er fan for over 30 years. I remember my dad taking me to games to see OJ play 27 years ago (that was back when the 9ers were a joke, trading the whole fucking team for a broken down future murderer with gimpy legs and a penchant for white pussy...but, hey, can you blame him? I love the white girls too, and the asian girls, and the black girls, indian girls, persian girls...hell, I just love the ladies).
You should know a couple of things:
Jerry Rice does not make my top ten all time niners that I love list (which includes, Lott, Montana, Young, John Taylor, John "blocked LT into the fucking ground and kicked his ass" Frank, Bryant Young).
He is not my first pick if starting a dream franchise, though that has more to do with offensive philosophy. I take Sweetness because he is such a complete running back--all heart, great receiver, one of the all-time blockers, and all the leader any team needs. Besides, the farther away from the ball presnap, the less value they have in my scheme.

Rice was always rather unlikeable, a bit bitchy or as my friend might say "cunty." He was selfish, cranky, irritable and undoubtedly one of the most consistantly brilliant player to ever step between the lines for 20 years.
My argument for Rice being the greatest of all time is as follows:
Because football is so team-oriented, I argue that it is impossible to compare different positions in order to determine who is the best. One cannot accurately compare the contributions an offensive lineman makes to his team versus a running back, qb or tight end, much less a middle linebacker or defensive end. For example, the game is set up to record the contributions of the running back on a running play but not the block a receiver made down field, the reverse pivot a qb made to draw the linebacker a step out of position, the offside chopblock a tackle made. The game records tackles made but it doesn't acknowledge the defensive tackle taking on a double team to seal a hole and force the runner into the arms of a defender. It records sacks but not ones that are the result of the defensive back playing terrific coverage. Rather everyone works in concert toward the same goal, scoring or stopping a score.
We can't even agree that Joe Montana is the most important player/contributor to those great niner teams much less call him the greatest player compared to Sweetness, Anthony Munoz, Joe Green, LT because, I would argue, we can't say that about anyone. Comparisons are specious.

So with that conundrum in mind, I think the next best way to decide who was the greatest of all time is to compare by position: With every other position, a handful of all-timers enter into the discussion. QB: Montana, Elway, Unitas, fucking Marino (all stats, no corizon) RB: Jim Brown, Payton (my pick), Campbell, Sanders (1/4 of his runs were for negative yards, did not block or catch passes, but boy could that fucker run), etc, etc.
But there is NO question who the greatest receiver of all time is. NONE (unless you're a contrarian or don't understand the agreed upon goals of playing football or you're a FUCKING lobotomy patient ). Rice is so much better than the next best receiver that none are even in the conversation. Fucker could run, catch, always was open, and was one of the best blocking receivers in the league [Remember those two long 90+ yard td catches JT had against the Rams on monday night football in '89 (my favorite niner superbowl team, by the by). Make sure to take note who was blocking his ass off all the way down the field.] The numbers don't lie. His are so much better than the next best, it's silly. He was that rare blend of incredible talent and insatiable work ethic, a blend that only the truly best have. Hell, Rice has the record for holding the most records.
So as far as Rice being the best player of all time, because we cannot (and should not) compare head to head, I would argue that he is more better than the next best receiver than any other player is at any other position in the history of the NFL. He dominated his position like none other before or since, making him the greatest of all time.

Monday, November 07, 2005

the greatest American writer

8/30/99 The Greatest American Writer

It has to be
Henry Charles
The great
Chin
Ass
Key

I saw you last night
nestled between
Bronte and Burroughs,
keeping time with the icons.
pretending not to care

Boo
Cow
Ski

This ode to you, lonely old courage teacher, is like
Surfing an oil slick
A purse snatcher on quaaludes
A drunk on the dole
A jubilant angel bouncing on a trampoline,
her luminous aura of golden curls
backlit by the setting sun

How much of you is legend
Myth
Lore
How much is playing the part?
The pockmarked, snarling iconoclast reinventing the rules,
The exiled bastard child of Celine and Dostoeski
The haggardly, loathing vagabond gripped
by the catharsis of movement.
It’s all such contrivance
but it’s all true.

Buke
wild, coarse, profane,
your soul shows in your eyes
and you fool only
those
who need you to be
their monochrome ideologue
swatting
at the smug and sanctimonious.
Critics say you’re crude
insolent
a phony
But no more or less
than us all:
the greatest
american
writer

songbird

10/10/02 SONGBIRD: Songs my friend Charles taught me


There’s a tiny songbird in my heart trying to get out
But I rarely let him.
Instead I drown him with dope and intellect and simmering rage
Or I stuff him in a box of fears buried in the cellar
And pretend not to hear his whistling chirps.

There’s a tiny songbird in my heart trying to get out
But I rarely let him.
“Keep it down,” I say. “Are you trying to ruin me?”
“I don’t want your help,” I tell him.
“You wanna make me all soft?”

There’s a tiny songbird in my heart trying to get out
But I rarely let him.
Occasionally, when I’m alone at night, I draw the shades and take him from his cage
And let him flutter about the room, stretching his atrophied wings.
His indigo feathers backlit by a waxing moon peeking through a crack in the blinds

There’s a tiny songbird in my heart trying to get out
But I rarely let him.
I took him out in public once, and he flew away.
I was sure he was gone forever
Until my heart flickered with his next escape.

There’s a tiny songbird in my heart trying to get out
But I rarely let him.

station in life

Station in Life

“Nah, man, let’s just get the hell out of here,” Rafi said.
He opened the window of our hostel room, then leaned his elbows against the sill and stared into the street. An oversized storefront lined in red neon dominated the second-story view. Three lingerie-clad women spent their days caged behind glass flinging carnal seductions at the passing foot traffic. To the left was a coffee shop with the best-priced dope in the city. A gay bar two doors down with a giant penis on the marquee – no words, just a big dick – advertised lunchtime happy hours in the blacked-out front window. “I’ve had enough of this city.”
Amsterdam was an incredible place, with its museums and flashpoints of reclining culture, picturesque canals snaking through streets lined with shops and eateries. But a week of hanging out in coffee shops and pubs in the Red Light district had saturated my inner hedonist. It was time to go.
I sat on the edge of the bunk bed thumbing through a guidebook of Holland while pulling on my beard. The fresh air flowing through the window barely permeated the fetor of stale morning breath, cigarette-stained clothes, and urine in the dank, gray room.
“Okay. What about Gouda?” I said. “It says it’s the most visited city in the Netherlands besides here.”
Rafi removed his rimless glasses. He huffed a few breaths on each lens and wiped them on his blue jeans. Then he hooked his glasses in the front of his tee shirt and leaned against the wall, running his delicate fingers over the bump on the bridge of his nose.
“Sure,” he said. “Let’s go.”
We grabbed our backpacks and strode into the hallway toward the stairs. Yellowed, peeling wallpaper lined the corridor. The matted lime green carpet was torn or missing in the places not covered with burn marks. The stench of piss – so ubiquitous in this hovel – obviously originated out here.
We winded down the creaky, wooden spiraling stairs. The manager, a Slav with a thick, syrupy accent and thinning strips of hair combed over a balding pate, grunted “good mornink” as we walked toward the door.
“You vill be leavink now?” he asked.
I turned and nodded.
“You enjoy my place, no?”
“Fabulous,” I said. For twelve guilders a night, it was.
We stepped out into the crisp, midday air. The sun had not yet subdued the chill, but the cloudless, azure sky set the backdrop for another perfect day. Our path through the district to the central train station teemed with traffic. Tiny European cars whizzed through the streets, horns bleating. Cross-legged musicians leaned against storefronts, guitar cases opened, strumming rock tunes for spare change. Stoned-out travelers devoured long, golden, glistening french fries drowned in mayonnaise.
Once inside, we snaked through the crowd to the ticket counter. A full-figured lady with blonde hair streaked gray and a bludgeoned face sat behind the window fingering her desk to the ambient hum of passing foot traffic.
“Two tickets to Gouda,” I said smiling.
“It’s pronounced Howda,” she sniffed, like the “H” was caught in the back of her throat.
“Well… I don’t care Howda fuck you pronounce it, just give me two tickets for the next train.”
She looked up at me then returned to her computer licking her lips disdainfully.
“Thirty-nine guilders each. That’s seventy-eight guilders total,” she monotoned. “The next train is in four minutes.”
Rafi handled the transaction, muttering a “danka,” and we hustled for the platform. We found an empty car toward the rear and took two seats facing each other next to the window.
“Danka?” I asked. “Why danka?”
“She’s old enough to remember the occupation,” he said, leaning in and lowering his voice. “You saw, man, she had the eyes of a sympathizer.”
“Jesus, man. Besides, a ‘sympathizer’ doesn’t necessarily speak German.”
“True. But they’re not turned off by it either.” He picked at a faded acne scar on his cheek, his upper lip lifting in a slight sneer. “Call it my own little Litmus test.”
Sympathizer was Rafi’s euphemism for Nazi complicity. Never mind history or logic, he seemed forever suspicious of English spoken with an accent. Everywhere we went in Europe the “fucking Nazis” were there. Amsterdam – with its “blonde, blue-eyed social dictates and cosmopolitical stench of neutrality” – had proven particularly cruel.
I reached into my backpack for the guidebook.
“So, I guess Germany and Poland are still out of the question?” I asked.
Rafi didn’t answer. He just sucked on the tiny Star of David attached to a gold chain around his neck. Whenever he was pensive or emotional, he’d suckle that piece of jewelry like a nipple.
Our silence continued as the train pulled away from the station. Within fifteen minutes, we were out of the city. Green fields dotted with tulips flashed across the window in a hypnotic blur of colors. Rafi stared out into the openness, bits of scenery reflecting in his vacant, brown eyes.
“You know, man,” he said, returning from his reverie. “I just couldn’t get comfortable.”
I scratched my head and nodded.
“Maybe,” he said, “the next place will be better.”
“Yeah, maybe.”

Saturday, November 05, 2005

Western Women are Liberated?

Let me be careful here because I do not see myself as a misogynist. In fact, depite years of feeling terribly misanthropic towards humanity in general (and believe me, supporting evidence for hating people is not hard to find), I've found myself in the last few years making different choices about how I want to see people. Consequently, I realize that I actually love people, humanity, deeply and have a tremendous capacity to intuitively feel those ties that bind all of us on this planet together.
However, I continue to notice how many women that I know who react negatively to the treatment of women in other cutures, especially religiously conservative ones (muslims, orthodox jews, etc), which strikes me as sooooooo naive (at best) if not ignorant/unselfconscious [bear in mind, somewhere along the way self-conscious was twisted into something negative, which is bewildering; to be conscious of yourself, to be able to make choices and respond rather than react, is all that we have as humans. Everything else is pure reptilian brain...but I digress].

It's not that those women from other cultures are or are not oppressed. More so, it's how unaware western women seem to be 1) of the culturally-relative stance they are taking (I cannot tell you how many women in orthodox Jewish communities that I had this conversation with when I spent 6 months in Israel laughed about their own "oppression." It's silly to judge such things without respecting the fact that we are applying western values on something that is distinctly nonwestern; and 2) of how deeply and perniciously oppressed western women really are. It's just less overt.
Let's look at just ONE small example of what I mean: How many of you ladies out there worry about your weight? How many of you looked in the mirror today and felt fat (Or anything that relates body type to self-image) Who of you have ever had an eating disorder or knew someone who did?
To me, it's heart breaking. The world arround you tells you that you are so inadequate that you constantly have to feel guilt about eating or even worse starve yourself on purpose or eat and then vomit. What the fuck has society done to us that we have anorexia as a social disease? That women stuff their faces with a quart of ice cream, bury the carton in the garbage and either hate themselves or stick their fingers down their throats?
Of course, they have eating disorders in non-western countries, but it's called STARVATION. There's no anorexia in Indonesia or Sudan or Crown Heights for that matter.

just ranting

so, I'm at work right now. The tail end of a three-year stint working as a custodial artist for the city of Piedmont. All in all, I set up tables and chairs and have a big key ring. It's a lot of sitting around watching sports on a grainy 12-inch black and white television or doing my school work/grading papers (I teach English and am a graduate student).
All in all, it's been a fantastic job because:
--I've time and space set aside most weeks to do my shit. I'm a terrible procrastinator, so to be held captive at work has been a real blessing and forced me to get stuff done.
--I end up getting paid to study or grade papers or watch my teams play...and lose (more on that later, perhaps tomorrow. The niners suck, but that's okay because I got TWENTY great seasons and five friggin' superbowls)
--I think it helps me truly appreciate every time I go to campus to teach or take classes. In three years, I've never really gotten sucked into the vortex, that bitchfest zone of joint commiseration that's in every working environment (boofuckinghoo) but seems especially exacerbated when in an English department. My theory is that because I have other blue collar commitments, I am fortunate enough to have a certain perspective on teaching and being a student that helps me see how fucking lucky we all are. Yes, teaching is hard, perhaps the most challenging, draining (and stimulating, interesting, rewarding) work I've ever done. But it's not a job. No, no, no, a job, my friends, is plunging corn-studded shit out of a toilet or washing vomit out of a urinal, busting ass lifting and carrying and sweating...Ain't no callouses on my hands from photocopying and stapling.
Besides being a heterosexual male English teacher is similar to being a heterosexual male dancer. I always thought it would be great to be a dancer because it's all women and gay men. Hey fantastic. Easy pickings. Well, being a part of an English department is basically the same (except English teachers aren't NEARLY as hot or nimble as dancers. The jury is still out on which group is more emotionally fragile. I think English teachers have lower self-esteem than dancers). I call it the "in the land of the blind..." syndrome. And it's good to be king.

Friday, November 04, 2005

day number one

All I ever really wanted was a place to rant and rave. All you cyber heads out there looking for something to chew on...Well, let me break you off a piece, some food for thought if you will...
I didn't really plan to get into this blogging shit, but I thought that I needed a space to drain my madness, for exercise and masterbation (while fun and fulfilling) don't always sate my intellectual curiousity and preternatural need to use communication as a means of figuring out what I think about something. I think people have it all wrong, are trained to think about shit assbackwards when it comes to communicating.
Writing, speaking, are not just tools to demonstrate what we know or think or think we know. More so, communication (having to go through that process of taking those nebulous ideas floating around in our heads and putting them into tangible, visceral form) is a means for us to figure out what we think. Writing/speaking to learn. By going through the process, we often can find out what we know or think or think we know.